Exide Pumps Another ₹100 Crore into its Lithium-Ion Bet — the Factory Is Nearly Ready, but Profits Are Not

Exide Industries, India’s largest battery maker — the company behind the lead-acid batteries that start most cars and keep home inverters running during power cuts — has invested another ₹99.99 crore in its wholly owned lithium-ion subsidiary, Exide Energy Solutions Ltd (EESL), bringing total funding for the greenfield cell factory near Bengaluru to ₹4,902.23 crore. [announcement] This is the fourth tranche in six months and part of a ₹1,400 crore plan approved by the board in January 2026 to cover both equipment spending and initial working capital as the plant moves from installation to production. The steady drip of cash — ₹650 crore deployed under the January plan, with ₹750 crore still to go — reflects a business entering its most capital-hungry phase: commissioning four production lines while the subsidiary burns through ₹248.16 crore a year with barely ₹157.56 crore in revenue. [announcement]

The Investment Tally and What’s Left

Each investment in the sequence served the same purpose — funding the phased completion of a multi-gigawatt lithium-ion cell facility — and the pace has quickened markedly in recent months.

The cumulative ₹4,902.23 crore includes earlier investments predating these quarters. [announcement] EESL’s net worth at the end of March 2026 stood at ₹3,991.06 crore — meaning the parent has effectively funded the subsidiary’s entire equity base and then some. [announcement]

Why the Money Keeps Flowing

Exide’s management has been unambiguous about the lithium-ion project being the company’s “investment for tomorrow” — the third pillar of capital allocation after factory automation and the core lead-acid business. The factory itself is now in the final stretch. On the Q4 FY26 earnings call in May 2026, Managing Director Avik Roy said cylindrical cell samples would begin shipping to customers “around this month,” with prismatic line trials starting shortly after. The February 2026 call had already indicated that the prismatic LFP line — aimed at three-wheelers and e-rickshaws — would “possibly be the first revenue stream from the cell side” because it requires less stringent OEM validation.

The presentation deck from May 2026 shows 95% of utilities nearing completion across all four lines and approximately 45 supply agreements signed. The February deck described the cylindrical line as “validation in progress” and the prismatic line as “installation and commissioning in progress.” In plain terms: the building is ready, the machines are in place, and the company is now producing test cells to prove they meet customer specifications. Commercial dispatches were expected within “plus/minus one month” of March 2026.

What It Costs the Parent

Exide Industries’ standalone business — the lead-acid battery operation that funds this project — is in steady, unspectacular health. Standalone revenue for FY26 was ₹17,268.92 crore, up 4.1% year-on-year, and net profit rose 3.2% to ₹1,111.33 crore. [standalone FY26 annual] The automotive OEM segment grew over 25% in both Q4 and Q3, the replacement market expanded in double digits, and the solar segment crossed ₹1,000 crore in revenue for the first time. These segments together generated the cash that kept the parent company debt-free on a standalone basis. [standalone FY26 annual]

The consolidated picture absorbs the subsidiary’s financial weight. Consolidated FY26 EBITDA margin was 10.9%, virtually unchanged from 11.1% in FY25. [consolidated FY26 annual] EESL’s ₹248.16 crore loss for FY26 was absorbed within a consolidated net profit of ₹859.92 crore. [announcement][consolidated FY26 annual] The parent’s standalone EBITDA margin, at 11.7% for FY26, has lived in a tight band between 11.7% and 14.2% for at least six fiscal years — the current level is at the low end of that range, not a break below it. [standalone FY26 annual]

The Cash Burn and What Comes Next

EESL’s financials tell the story of a pre-revenue heavy-industry startup. Turnover for FY26 was ₹157.56 crore — mostly from the existing battery-pack assembly business using imported cells — against a loss of ₹248.16 crore. [announcement] The subsidiary had already lost ground on revenue: FY24 turnover was ₹239.14 crore (post-merger with an earlier group entity), meaning the top line actually shrank while the parent kept funding the capex cycle. [announcement]

Management has so far declined to specify when EESL will turn profitable. On the May 2026 call, Avik Roy pushed the question back: “Let us ramp up our plant. Let us operate at 85% utilisation with 90% yield. And that will be the time when I will come back and reply to this question.” Pravin Saraf, MD and CEO of EESL, said on the February 2026 call that achieving 90% yield and 85% plant utilisation, combined with some localisation, would bring costs in line with import-parity pricing. The company’s technology partner is SVOLT, a Chinese lithium-ion cell manufacturer, and the machinery and know-how were already imported before China tightened export restrictions.

The remaining ₹750 crore under the January 2026 approval is expected to cover both capex and working capital for FY27. CFO Manoj Agarwal said on the February call that the funding was designed “to ensure that our leverage is lower in EESL” — a signal that the parent intends to keep the subsidiary funded with equity rather than debt, at least through the commissioning phase. Phase 1 capacity is 6 gigawatt-hours, but the site and utilities are sized for 12 gigawatt-hours, and management has said Phase 2 investment would be “much lesser” than Phase 1. The decision to expand will depend on how quickly EV adoption picks up in India.

---

The Investment Tally and What’s Left

Why the Money Keeps Flowing

What It Costs the Parent

The Cash Burn and What Comes Next

Sources